The consultation period for the City of Ottawa's Special Events By-law Review has ended. City staff are now reviewing survey data and analyzing feedback from the public to support policy decisions in this review. Thank you for your feedback throughout this process. You can find existing reports on previous public engagement opportunities in the News Feed of our EngageOttawa page. Any questions or concerns can be directed to the project team by phone at 613-580-2424 ext. 29888 or by emailing bylawreviews@ottawa.ca.

The final survey concerning the Review of Special Event By-laws is now open.

This survey asks questions about special events permits, block parties, demonstrations, sidewalk sales, and public behaviour.

Have your say before this survey closes.

Go to survey

The fifth survey concerning the Review of Special Event By-laws is now open.

This survey asks questions about demonstrations.

Have your say before October 8th, 2024.

Go to Survey

Our fourth survey, which explored regulations for events on city streets, has now closed. Results from this survey will be reported on this site once we have reviewed all submissions. Please check back or follow this project to see the survey results once all submissions have been reviewed and analyzed.

Review of special event by-laws: Environmental issues

Our first impressions

The survey’s findings indicate a high level of personal commitment in environmentally conscious behavior among special event attendees. Eighty-four per cent of respondents indicated they actively avoid single-use plastics and reusable products are also prevalent, with 77 per cent intending to use reusable water bottles and 72 per cent preferring food vendors offering compostable or reusable cutlery and plates. Approximately 70 per cent of respondents expressed a willingness to pick up litter and 90 per cent of respondents prefer to use mobile/digital tickets when the option is available.

Responses indicated a significant demand for sustainable options, as 96 per cent of respondents reported using appropriate bins for waste, recycling, and compost at special events. Notably, 97 per cent believe that recycling stations should be mandatory at special events, and 88 per cent think that composting bins should also be mandatory. These findings highlight the importance of responsible waste disposal. In terms of environmental impact, 42 per cent of respondents believe that special events should offset their carbon emissions. Additionally, 55 per cent advocate for the mandatory use of reusable cups and utensils.

Regarding transportation choices, 51 per cent of respondents are likely to use public transit (OC Transpo), while only 42 per cent would walk or cycle to events. Event organizers should consider promoting sustainable transportation options further, as collaboration with public transit and cycling infrastructure could encourage sustainable transportation choices.

Financial considerations also come into play, as 45 per cent of respondents are willing to pay higher prices for sustainable service items like compostable cutlery. Overall, 67 per cent emphasize minimizing environmental impact, and 75 per cent consider environmental concerns when attending special events.

In summary, respondents believe that event organizers should prioritize waste management, encourage reusable practices, and consider environmental impact when planning special events.

Unfortunately, the small number of residents that opted to participate in this survey suggests that the views expressed by participants do not reflect the broader community. While the survey shows there are opportunities to encourage more sustainable practices at events, it also shows that more effort will be needed to raise awareness about the importance of good environmental stewardship by event organizers and participants.

Background

This survey ran on Engage Ottawa from May 1, 2024 to May 31, 2024. Seventy-six residents responded to this survey. The total number of responses for each question is reported beside the question. For convenience, individual responses are reported as both a total and a percentage.

Responses to open-ended questions have been reported above in summary format. Individual responses have been cataloged and made anonymous for sharing with the project team and other City departments where appropriate.

Survey Three results

In May we asked residents to share their thoughts on waste reduction and environmental protection. Our goal was to assess a range of issues, including the reduction of waste, the availability of greener options and the environmental impact of special events more widely.

Q1: How likely are you to practice the following environmentally responsible practices while

attending special events? (76 responses)

Picking up litter:

• I don’t know: 1 respondent or 1.3 per cent
• Unlikely: 7 respondents or 9.2 per cent
• Somewhat unlikely: 15 respondents or 19.7 per cent
• Somewhat likely: 22 respondents or 28.9 per cent
• Very likely: 31 respondents or 40.7 per cent

Avoiding single-use plastics:

• I don’t know: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• Unlikely: 4 respondents or 5.2 per cent
• Somewhat unlikely: 8 respondents or 10.5 per cent
• Somewhat likely: 33 respondents or 43.4 per cent
• Very likely: 31 respondents or 40.7 per cent

Choosing OC Transpo/ParaTranspo:

• I don’t know: 2 respondents or 2.6 per cent
• Unlikely: 26 respondents or 34.2 per cent
• Somewhat unlikely: 9 respondents or 11.8 per cent
• Somewhat likely: 22 respondents or 28.9 per cent
• Very likely: 17 respondents or 22.3 per cent

Cycling or walking to/from the event:

• I don’t know: 2 respondents or 2.6 per cent
• Unlikely: 22 respondents or 28.9 per cent
• Somewhat unlikely: 10 respondents or 13.1 per cent
• Somewhat likely: 19 respondents or 25 per cent
• Very likely: 23 respondents or 30.2 per cent

Using reusable water bottles:

• I don’t know: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• Unlikely: 6 respondents or 7.8 per cent
• Somewhat unlikely: 3 respondents or 3.9 per cent
• Somewhat likely: 8 respondents or 10.5 per cent
• Very likely: 59 respondents or 77.6 per cent

Using the appropriate bins available (garbage, recycle, compost):

• I don’t know: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• Unlikely: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• Somewhat unlikely: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• Somewhat likely: 3 respondents or 3.9 per cent
• Very likely: 73 respondents or 96.1 per cent

Using mobile/digital tickets versus printed versions, where applicable:

• I don’t know: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• Unlikely: 5 respondents or 6.6 per cent
• Somewhat unlikely: 5 respondents or 6.6 per cent
• Somewhat likely: 11 respondents or 14.5 per cent
• Very likely: 57 respondents or 75 per cent

Select a food vendor who offers reusable or compostable containers and cutlery:

• I don’t know: 5 respondents or 6.5 per cent
• Unlikely: 6 respondents or 7.9 per cent
• Somewhat unlikely: 10 respondents or 13.1 per cent
• Somewhat likely: 30 respondents or 39.4 per cent
• Very likely: 25 respondents or 32.9 per cent

Q2: Which of the following practices do you think should be required at special events? (Select all that apply) (76 responses)

• Reduce water use/waste: 46 respondents or 60.5 per cent
• Use reusable cups and utensils: 42 respondents or 55.3 per cent
• Provide recycling stations: 74 respondents or 97.4 per cent
• Provide composting bins: 67 respondents or 88.2 per cent
• Reduce or offset carbon emissions: 32 respondents or 42.1 per cent

Q3: Would you be willing to pay slightly higher prices for food and beverages offered with sustainable service items, like reusable or compostable dishes and utensils? (76 responses)

• Yes: 34 respondents or 44.7 per cent
• No: 15 respondents or 19.7 per cent
• Maybe/uncertain: 27 respondents or 35.5 per cent

Q4: How important is it for event organizers to minimize environmental impacts? (76 responses)

• Uncertain/no opinion: 1 respondent or 1.3 per cent
• Not important: 4 respondents or 5.3 per cent
• Somewhat important: 20 respondents or 26.3 per cent
• Very important: 51 respondents or 67.1 per cent

Q5: How do environmental concerns influence your decisions about participating in special events? (76 responses)

• Uncertain/no opinion: 5 respondents or 6.6 per cent
• Not important: 14 respondents or 18.4 per cent
• Somewhat important: 40 respondents or 52.6 per cent
• Very important: 17 respondents or 22.4 per cent

Q6: Do you have any suggestions for making special events more environmentally friendly? (4000 character maximum) (37 responses)

In response to this question, staff received several suggestions for making special events more environmentally friendly:

• Reduce waste: This includes using reusable or biodegradable containers and utensils, composting food scraps, and providing recycling bins.
• Encourage sustainable transportation: This includes providing bike parking, offering discounts for using public transportation, and running shuttle buses.
• Conserve water: This includes providing water bottle filling stations and encouraging people to bring reusable water bottles.
• Reduce noise pollution: This includes lowering sound levels at events.
• Educate attendees: This includes providing clear information about what can be recycled or composted and encouraging people to be mindful of their environmental impact.
• Partner with sustainable vendors: This includes encouraging vendors to use eco-friendly products and packaging.
• Offset carbon emissions: This could involve planting trees or investing in renewable energy.

Q7: In your opinion, what are the biggest obstacles to reducing the environmental impact of special events? (4000 character maximum) (50 responses)

Several key challenges emerged from this question on reducing the environmental impact of special events. Cost was a notable worry, with respondents expressing concern that organizers would struggle to afford sustainable practices and that attendees would be unwilling to pay more for them. Waste generation was another significant obstacle, with reported concerns highlighting the sheer volume produced, attendee carelessness, and the lack of proper infrastructure for sorting recyclables and compostables.

Convenience also played a role in resident responses as some attendees report prioritizing ease over sustainability and thus they may not be willing to take the extra steps required for recycling, composting, or choosing reusable items. Public awareness and education were seen as lacking, with attendees unsure about proper waste disposal practices at events. Logistical challenges included managing large crowds, ensuring sufficient and appropriate waste bins, and limited access to public transportation for attendees.

Finally, some responses pointed to a need for stronger regulations or enforcement to hold organizers accountable for sustainable practices, while others emphasized the importance of collaboration between organizers, vendors, and the city to achieve environmental goals.

Q8: Do you have any additional comments concerning the environmental impact of special events? (4000 character maximum) (20 responses)

Special events can have a significant environmental impact. Survey respondents highlighted several key areas for improvement in response to this question:

• Waste Management: Many comments highlighted the issue of waste generation at events. People want to see:

1. More compostable and recyclable options for food containers, utensils, and cups.
2. A sufficient number of clearly marked recycling and compost bins.
3. Less reliance on single-use plastics.
4. Efforts to educate attendees about proper waste sorting.

• Event Organization: Some responses pointed to the responsibility of event organizers, including:

1. Holding organizers accountable for preventing damage to event sites.
2. Ensuring a good supply of recycling and compost bins.

• Transportation: A few comments addressed transportation concerns with suggestions like:

1. Offering free or improved public transport options like shuttles to reduce traffic congestion and emissions.
2. Reopening parkways to car traffic after Sunday morning bike days to avoid idling vehicles.

• Other Considerations:

1. The environmental impact extends beyond the event site itself.
2. Importance of offering healthy food options in sustainable packaging.
3. Encouraging a cultural shift to make sustainability practices more appealing.

Overall, the responses show a strong desire for special events to be more environmentally friendly. Respondents want to see a combination of efforts from organizers, vendors, and attendees to reduce waste, promote sustainable practices, and minimize the environmental footprint of these events.

Q9: Would you like to help us by answering some questions about yourself? (74 responses)

• No: 22 responses or 29.7 per cent
• Yes: 52 responses or 70.3 per cent

Q10: In a typical year, what types of special events do you participate in? (52 responses)

• Music festivals: 28 respondents or 53.8 per cent
• Food festivals: 37 respondents or 71.2 per cent
• Ethno-cultural events: 21 respondents or 40.4 per cent
• Fairs: 42 respondents or 80.8 per cent
• Community events: 15 respondents or 28.8 per cent
• Block parties: 12 respondents or 23.1 per cent
• Events at City beaches: 17 respondents or 32.7 per cent
• Running/cycling events: 18 respondents or 34.6 per cent
• Parades: 18 respondents or 34.6 per cent
• Other: 5 respondents or 9.6 per cent

Q11: How do you identify or express your gender? (Select all that apply) (52 responses)

• Man: 17 respondents or 32.7 per cent
• Woman: 35 respondents or 67.3 per cent
• Transgender: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• Non-binary: 0 respondents or 0 per cent

Q12: Are you an Aboriginal/Indigenous person? (Select all that apply) (52 responses)

• I am Inuit: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• I am Métis: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• I am First Nations: 0 respondents or 0.0 per cent
• No: 52 respondents or 100 per cent

Q13. Are you a member of a visible minority group? (52 responses)

• Yes: 8 respondents or 15.4 per cent
• No: 44 respondents or 84.6 per cent

Q14. Are you a person with one or more disabilities? (52 responses)

• Yes: 9 respondents or 17.3 per cent
• No: 43 respondents or 82.7 per cent

Q15. Are you a member of the 2SLGBTQQIA+ community? (Two-spirited, Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Trans, Queer, Questioning Intersex, Asexual plus) (52 responses)

• Yes: 8 respondents or 15.4 per cent
• No: 44 respondents or 84.6 per cent

Q16. Which of the following describes you: (52 responses)

• Not born in Canada and have lived in Canada for less than 5 years: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• Not born in Canada and have lived in Canada for over 10 years: 7 respondents or 13.5 per cent
• Not born in Canada and have lived in Canada for 5 to 10 years: 1 respondent or 1.9 per cent
• Born in Canada: 44 respondents or 84.6 per cent

Q17. Please indicate your age from the categories below: (52 responses)

• Under 18: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• 18-34: 10 respondents or 19.2 per cent
• 35-54: 23 respondents or 44.2 per cent
• 55 to 69: 14 respondents or 26.9 per cent
• 70 or older: 5 respondents or 9.6 per cent

Next Steps

A detailed analysis of survey results will occur over the coming months. This will include analysis through an equity, diversity, and inclusion lens that will utilize demographic data collected through the survey’s “Tell us about yourself” section. Full analysis will be provided when the project team reports to Committee and Council in early 2025.

Inquiries

If you have questions or comments about the survey results, please contact By-law Reviews at bylawreviews@ottawa.ca or 613-580-2424 ext. 29529.

Review of Special Events By-laws

Survey 2 Results

In April we asked residents to share their thoughts on how to ensure special events are safe and inclusive. Our goal was to assess a range of issues including accessibility, harassment, sexual harassment, drugs and alcohol, smoking and vaping and extreme weather events.

Our First Impressions

Our initial assessment of the data collected provided valuable insights into various aspects of special events. The majority of contributors reported that they were not prevented from attending special events due to accessibility concerns, suggesting that existing accommodations are generally effective. Forty-nine per cent of residents indicated they believed that permits should be refused for events lacking accessibility plans. Many respondents (58 per cent) thought the City should decline permits for events that conflict with the Ontario Human Rights Code. Almost half (48 per cent) of contributors believed that the City should consider implementing a code of conduct for special event participants. This underscores residents’ beliefs that special events should be welcome and inclusive for everyone.

Issues of greatest concern included:

• Harassment Incidents: 41 per cent of contributors either witnessed or personally experienced harassment at special events. However, 90 per cent of these indicated that incidents went unreported. This highlights the need for analysis of reporting mechanisms and increased awareness.
• Discrimination Incidents: 39 per cent of contributors reported they had experienced or witnessed discrimination at special events.
• Nearly half of contributors expressed uncertainty about the effectiveness of event staff in managing harassment and discrimination incidents.

A significant portion (40 per cent) of contributors remained unsure if special event policies adequately prevent harassment. Strengthening and communicating these policies more effectively could enhance attendee safety. Sixty-one per cent of contributors had no specific suggestions to prevent harassment. Respondents indicated they lacked awareness regarding special event staff’s efforts to address discrimination. Similarly, almost half of survey contributors were uncertain about whether event plans or policies adequately addressed discrimination. Most contributors did not recall seeing messaging related to sexual harassment and violence prevention in the last 12 months.

When asked about extreme weather events, respondents advised that lack of shade, extreme heat, and sudden heavy rain were the most frequently experienced by special event attendees. Other weather events listed were not experienced as often as reported by survey respondents and are less of area cause for concern. Similarly, survey contributors had little concern about food and drink safety at special events. The majority (79 per cent) felt confident about food and drink safety at special events, which indicates a generally positive perception of food safety measures.

The survey’s results shed light on critical aspects of special events. While existing accessibility regulations appear effective in ensuring accessibility for attendees, there is room for improvement. The prevalence of unreported harassment incidents underscores a potential need for better reporting mechanisms and ongoing staff/ volunteer / bystander training. There is a desire for Ottawa’s special events to be safe and inclusive for all residents. However, there are differing opinions on how to achieve this balance, particularly regarding freedom of expression and addressing the needs of different groups.

Background

This survey ran on Engage Ottawa from April 3 to April 29, 2024, and was promoted through social media posts and paid promotion on Facebook running from April 23 to April 29, 2024. In total, 92 residents responded to this survey. The total number of responses for each question is reported beside the question. For convenience, individual responses are reported as both a total and a percentage.

Responses to open-ended questions have been reported in summary format. Individual responses have been cataloged and made anonymous for sharing with the project team and other City departments where appropriate.

Next Steps

A detailed analysis of survey results will occur over the coming months. This will include analysis through an equity, diversity, and inclusion lens that will utilize demographic data collected through the survey’s “Tell us about yourself” section. Full analysis will be provided when the project team reports to Committee and Council in early 2025.

Inquiries

If you have questions or comments about the survey results, please contact By-law Reviews at bylawreviews@ottawa.ca or 613-580-2424 ext. 29529.

Survey Results

In April we asked residents to share their thoughts on how to ensure special events are safe and inclusive. Our goal was to assess a range of issues including, accessibility, harassment, sexual harassment, drugs and alcohol, smoking and vaping and extreme weather events.

Q1. Have you, or a friend or family member, ever been unable to participate in a special event due to a disability that was not accommodated by the organizer? (92 responses)

• Yes: 17 respondents or 18.5 per cent
• No: 57 respondents or 62 per cent
• I don’t recall: 18 respondents or 19.6 per cent

Q2. Please share your experience: (4000 characters max) (17 responses)

Responses outlined challenges faced by people with disabilities in Ottawa when attending various events and accessing public spaces. Responses spoke to challenges with physical barriers (lack of ramps, accessible washrooms, wide doorways, and designated parking spaces), informational barriers (lack of available information about available services) and communication barriers (absence of sign language interpreters, assistive listening devices, or captioned presentations). Per survey results, winter events often did not have adequate snow clearing to support accessibility needs. For festivals, responses cited crowds, limited seating, and lack of quiet space as areas of concern.

Q3. Do you have suggestions for how to better address the problems you have described? (4000 characters max) (16 responses)

Responses captured a wide range of accessibility needs and suggestions for improvement. Physical accessibility requirements focused on providing more available seating options for festivals, more available accessible parking spaces, reliable and accessible public transit, and adequate snow and ice removal at winter events. Responses spoke to how high ticket prices can be a financial barrier for persons on Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP).

Suggestions for improvements also focused on ensuring organizers provide quiet zones and sensory retreat areas with staff who are trained on neurodiversity. Similarly, improvements for crowd management were highlighted as potential solutions. Further, respondents advocated for reduced wait times for persons with disabilities and more readily available information for persons requiring accommodation at events.

Q4. Have you experienced or witnessed harassment at a special event in Ottawa? (88 responses)

• Yes, once: 7 respondents or 8 per cent
• Yes, more than once: 29 respondents or 33 per cent
• No: 41 respondents or 46.6 per cent
• Uncertain/prefer not to say: 11 respondents or 12.5 per cent

Q5. Did you report these incidents? (29 responses)

• Yes: 3 respondents or 10.3 per cent
• No: 26 respondents or 89.7 per cent

Q6. Do you have any comments to share about your experiences reporting harassment? (Was it easy to do, was it taken seriously, how was it addressed?) (3 responses)

There were minimal responses to this question. Responses centered around individual experiences with protests and counter protests during the Winter 2022 Freedom Convoy event that had significant impacts on Ottawa’s downtown core.

Q7. Please explain why you chose not to report any of these experiences. (24 responses)

Responses indicated that when event attendees witness something they feel is inappropriate, they do not feel safe intervening. Responses expressed concerns over police favoring one side in protest/counter protest situations. Some contributors indicated they believed certain special events were not inclusive and they witnessed behavior they found offensive to their own personal beliefs.

Q8. Did you report this incident? (7 responses)

• Yes: 1 respondent or 14.3 per cent
• No: 6 respondents or 85.7 per cent

Q9. Please explain why you chose not to report this experience: (5 responses)

Responses cited uncertainty over the reporting procedure, feeling overwhelmed by the situation they were in, and a fear of retaliation as reasons they did not report. One respondent indicated that disagreements were to be expected and as such, they also did not report their experience.

Q10. Do you have any comments to share about your reporting experience? (Was it easy to do, was it taken seriously, how was it addressed?) (1 response)

The singular response to this question indicated the reporting process for harassment was slow and did not feel like a priority to the reporting body.

Q11. Are event staff and volunteers effective in stopping harassment when it occurs? (92 responses)

• Always: 4 respondents or 4.3 per cent
• Most of the time: 8 respondents or 8.7 per cent
• Sometimes: 20 respondents or 21.7 per cent
• Rarely: 10 respondents or 10.9 per cent
• Never: 6 respondents or 6.5 per cent
• I don’t know/No opinion: 44 respondents or 47.8 per cent

Q12. Do current event plans and policies do enough to prevent harassment at special events? (92 responses)

• Yes: 20 respondents or 21.7 per cent
• No: 30 respondents or 32.6 per cent
• Uncertain: 37 respondents or 40.2 per cent
• Other: 5 respondents or 5.4 per cent

Q13. Do you have any specific suggestions that may help to prevent incidents of harassment at special events? (92 responses)

• Yes: 36 respondents or 39.1 per cent
• No: 56 respondents or 60.9 per cent

Q14. Please share your suggestion with the By-law Review Team (4000 characters max) (36 responses)

Responses relayed a desire for increased law enforcement and security presence at events. Respondents indicated they wanted on-site security to appear more approachable and for them to be trained on how to handle harassment complaints appropriately. Further, survey answers indicated that a clear code of conduct with a zero-tolerance policy for harassment would be helpful, as would bystander intervention training for staff and as volunteers at events. Contributors advised they want more clear information on where to report harassment and for there to be designated safe spaces for attendees to report harassment at special events.

Q15. Have you ever experienced or witnessed discrimination at a special event in Ottawa? (87 responses)

• Yes, once: 5 respondents or 5.7 per cent
• Yes, more than once: 29 respondents or 33 per cent
• No: 42 respondents or 48.3 per cent
• Uncertain/prefer not to say: 11 respondents or 12.6 per cent

Q16. Which of the following have you experienced or witnessed? (Check all that apply) (29 responses)

• Discrimination against a participant by event staff: 10 respondents or 34.5 per cent
• Discrimination by a participant against another: 10 respondents or 34.5 per cent
• Discrimination against event staff by a participant: 16 respondents or 55.2 per cent
• Discrimination against event staff by other event staff: 3 respondents or 10.3 per cent
• Other: 8 respondents or 27.6 per cent

Q17. Did you report these incidents? (29 responses)

• Yes: 5 respondents or 17.2 per cent
• No: 24 respondents or 82.8 per cent

Q18. Do you have any comments to share about your experiences reporting discrimination? (Was it easy to do, was it taken seriously, how was it addressed?) (4000 characters max) (4 responses)

Responses to this question centered around respondents feeling unheard when they reported discrimination.

Q19. Please explain why you chose not to report any of these experiences: (17 responses)

Responses showed that survey contributors did not report incidents of discrimination they observed because they felt like it was not worth reporting and believed their complaints would be ignored. Some responses suggested that people did not feel safe reporting these incidents and had a belief that the justice system would not help them. Comments suggested a lack of clarity on who to report these incidents to or how to report them.

Q20. Which of the following have you experienced or witnessed? (Check all that apply) (5 responses)

• Discrimination against a participant by event staff: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• Discrimination by a participant against another: 3 respondents or 60.0 per cent
• Discrimination against event staff by a participant: 1 respondent or 20 per cent
• Discrimination against event staff by other event staff: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• Other: 1 respondent or 20 per cent

Q21. Did you report this incident? (5 responses)

• Yes: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• No: 5 respondents or 100 per cent

Q23. Please explain why you chose not to report this experience; (4000 characters max) (4 responses)

Respondents explained that they did not know who to tell or if reporting would help. Contributors assumed that the reporting process would be lengthy.

Q24.Do event staff and volunteers intervene to stop discrimination when it occurs? (89 responses)

• Always: 2 respondents or 2.2 per cent
• Most of the time: 7 respondents or 7.9 per cent
• Sometimes: 20 respondents or 22.5 per cent
• Rarely: 5 respondents or 5.6 per cent
• Never: 4 respondents or 4.5 per cent
• I don’t know/No opinion: 51 respondents or 57.3 per cent

Q25. Do event plans and policies do enough to prevent discrimination at special events? (89 responses)

• Yes: 20 respondents or 22.5 per cent
• No: 26 respondents or 29.2 per cent
• I don’t know/no opinion: 43 respondents or 48.3 per cent

Q26. Do you have any specific suggestions on how to help ensure special events are inclusive for all participants? (91 responses)

• Yes: 29 respondents or 31.9 per cent
• No: 62 respondents or 68.1 per cent

Q27. Please share your suggestion with the By-law Review Team: (4000 characters max) (28 responses)

Suggestions on how to ensure special events are inclusive for all were related to:

Accessibility: Responses highlighted the need for staff trained in neurodiversity and accessible event spaces.

Communication and Signage: Clear signage against discrimination and promoting inclusivity was suggested.

Security and Crowd Control: Having a clear plan for crowd control and a visible police/security presence was important to some respondents.

Enforcement and Policies: People suggested clear consequences for discrimination, proper training for event staff, and enforcing laws against hate speech and violence.

Q28. Do you recall seeing messages concerning sexual harassment and violence prevention at special events you have attended in the past 12 months? (90 responses)

• Yes: 7 respondents or 7.8 per cent
• No: 62 respondents or 68.9 per cent
• Uncertain: 21 respondents or 23.3 per cent

Q29. Do event plans and policies do enough to prevent sexual harassment/violence at special events? (90 responses)

• Yes: 15 respondents or 16.7 per cent
• No: 18 respondents or 20 per cent
• Uncertain: 55 respondents or 61.1 per cent
• Other: 2 respondents or 2.2 per cent

Q30. Do event staff intervene to stop sexual harassment/violence when it occurs? (91 responses)

• Always: 3 respondents or 3.3 per cent
• Most of the time: 2 respondents or 2.2 per cent
• Sometimes: 14 respondents or 15.4 per cent
• Rarely: 4 respondents or 4.4 per cent
• Never: 3 respondents or 3.3 per cent
• I don’t know/No opinion: 63 respondents or 69.2 per cent
• Other: 2 respondents or 2.2 per cent

Q31. Do you have any specific suggestions to help reduce sexual harassment/violence at special events? (91 responses)

• Yes: 18 respondents or 19.8 per cent
• No: 73 respondents or 80.2 per cent

Q32. Please share your suggestion with the By-law Review Team (4000 characters max) (18 responses)

This question received a wide variety of responses. Responses showed support for organizers, staff, and volunteers to receive training to help prevent sexual harassment. Additional responses included advocacy for stricter enforcement by police and more public education campaigns on the issue.

Q33. Do you smoke or vape, either cannabis or tobacco/nicotine? (91 responses)

• Yes, regularly: 9 respondents or 9.9 per cent
• Yes, occasionally: 4 respondents or 4.4 per cent
• No: 72 respondents or 79.1 per cent
• Prefer not to say: 6 respondents or 6.6 per cent

Q34. How frequently are you exposed to second-hand smoke and vapours at outdoor special events? (91 responses)

• Frequently: 28 respondents or 30.8 per cent
• Occasionally: 33 respondents or 36.3 per cent
• Rarely: 23 respondents or 25.3 per cent
• Never: 7 respondents or 7.7 per cent

Q35. How concerned are you about the amount of exposure to second-hand smoke and vapours at outdoor special events? (91 responses)

• Very concerned: 29 respondents or 31.9 per cent
• Moderately concerned: 18 respondents or 19.8 per cent
• Somewhat concerned: 17 respondents or 18.7 per cent
• Not concerned: 26 respondents or 28.6 per cent
• No opinion: 1 respondents or 1.1 per cent

Q36. Do event staff and volunteers intervene to stop illicit smoking or vaping when it occurs? (92 responses)

• Always: 4 respondents or 4.3 per cent
• Most of the time: 9 respondents or 9.8 per cent
• Sometimes: 9 respondents or 9.8 per cent
• Rarely: 24 respondents or 26.1 per cent
• Never: 13 respondents or 14.1 per cent
• Uncertain/No opinion: 33 respondents or 35.9 per cent

Q37. Do event staff and volunteers control access to designated smoking areas? (92 responses)

• Always: 3 respondents or 3.3 per cent
• Most of the time: 9 respondents or 9.8 per cent
• Sometimes: 8 respondents or 8.7 per cent
• Rarely: 15 respondents or 16.3 per cent
• Never: 3 respondents or 3.3 per cent
• Uncertain/No opinion: 54 respondents or 58.7 per cent

Q38. Should events be required to maintain a buffer zone to provide distance between designated smoking and non-smoking areas? (92 responses)

• Yes: 63 respondents or 68.5 per cent
• No: 14 respondents or 15.2 per cent
• Uncertain: 15 respondents or 16.3 per cent

Q39. How concerned are you about your safety due to drug or alcohol consumption at special events in Ottawa? (92 responses)

• Very concerned: 20 respondents or 21.7 per cent
• Moderately concerned: 17 respondents or 18.5 per cent
• Somewhat concerned: 23 respondents or 25 per cent
• Not concerned: 30 respondents or 32.6 per cent
• Uncertain/No opinion: 2 respondents or 2.2 per cent

Q40. Thinking of special events you have attended, how frequently have you noticed the following: (92 responses)

Identification checks for proof of age:

• Always: 17 respondents
• Often: 23 respondents
• Occasionally: 15 respondents
• Rarely: 12 respondents
• Never: 7 respondents
• Uncertain: 18 respondents

Availability of low-cost non-alcoholic drinks:

• Always: 6 respondents
• Often: 9 respondents
• Occasionally: 22 respondents
• Rarely: 20 respondents
• Never:11 respondents
• Uncertain: 23 respondents

Access to first aid:

• Always: 22 respondents
• Often: 22 respondents
• Occasionally: 20 respondents
• Rarely: 8 respondents
• Never: 1 respondent
• Uncertain: 13 respondents

Event security:

• Always: 26 respondents
• Often: 30 respondents
• Occasionally: 20 respondents
• Rarely: 5 respondents
• Never: 1 respondent
• Uncertain: 10 respondents

Helpful staff/volunteers:

• Always: 18 respondents
• Often: 32 respondents
• Occasionally: 25 respondents
• Rarely: 3 respondents
• Never: 1 respondent
• Uncertain: 13 respondents

Toilets and health facilities in accessible and well-lit areas:

• Always: 10 respondents
• Often: 27 respondents
• Occasionally: 29 respondents
• Rarely: 15 respondents
• Never: 2 respondents
• Uncertain: 8 respondents

Free water is provided and readily available

• Always: 3 respondents
• Often: 11 respondents
• Occasionally: 16 respondents
• Rarely: 28 respondents
• Never: 20 respondents
• Uncertain: 14 respondents

Safety signage in high traffic areas

• Always: 3 respondents
• Often: 15 respondents
• Occasionally: 30 respondents
• Rarely: 14 respondents
• Never: 3 respondents
• Uncertain: 27 respondents

Presence of police and paramedics

• Always: 12 respondents
• Often: 35 respondents
• Occasionally: 33 respondents
• Rarely: 3 respondents
• Never: 2 respondents
• Uncertain: 7 respondents

QR codes to mental health and substance use resources on tickets and/or entry bracelets

• Always: 10 respondents
• Often: 4 respondents
• Occasionally: 4 respondents
• Rarely: 16 respondents
• Never: 15 respondents
• Uncertain: 53 respondents

Q41. Do event staff and volunteers intervene to address incidents of public intoxication when they occur? (92 responses)

• Always: 3 respondents or 3.3 per cent
• Most of the time: 18 respondents or 19.6 per cent
• Sometimes: 17 respondents or 18.5 per cent
• Rarely: 16 respondents or 17.4 per cent
• Never: 1 respondent or 1.1 per cent
• Uncertain/No opinion: 37 respondents or 40.2 per cent

Q42. When purchasing food or drinks at a special event, how confident are you that the products will be safe to consume? (92 responses)

• Very confident: 41 respondents or 44.6 per cent
• Somewhat confident: 32 respondents or 34.8 per cent
• Somewhat concerned: 7 respondents or 7.6 per cent
• Very concerned: 6 respondents or 6.5 per cent
• Uncertain/No opinion: 6 respondents or 6.5 per cent

Q43. Have you ever experienced illness due to food or drinks served at a special event? (92 responses)

• No, or not that I am aware of: 80 respondents or 87 per cent
• Possibly. I did get sick following an event, but the source wasn’t confirmed: 11 respondents or 12 per cent
• Yes. The cause of illness was confirmed by a medical professional: 1 respondent or 1.1 per cent

Q44. Was this illness reported to Ottawa Public Health? (11 responses)

• Yes: 1 respondent or 9.1 per cent
• No: 10 respondents or 90.9 per cent
• Uncertain/I don’t recall: 0 respondents or 0 per cent

Q45. Have you experienced any of the following while attending a special event: (Check all that apply) (80 responses)

• Extreme heat: 53 respondents or 66.3 per cent
• Extreme cold: 28 respondents or 35 per cent
• Sudden heavy rain: 40 respondents or 50 per cent
• Freezing rain: 8 respondents or 10 per cent
• Lightning: 23 respondents or 28.8 per cent
• Heavy winds (enough to break small branches or cause balance issues): 26 respondents or 32.5 per cent
• Lack of shade: 59 respondents or 73.8 per cent
• Poor air quality: 14 respondents or 17.5 per cent
• Other (please specify): 3 respondents or 3.8 per cent

Q46. Do event plans and policies effectively address participant safety during extreme weather events? (92 responses)

• Always: 5 respondents or 5.4 per cent
• Most of the time: 19 respondents or 20.7 per cent
• Some of the time: 22 respondents or 23.9 per cent
• Rarely: 14 respondents or 15.2 per cent
• Never: 3 respondents or 3.3 per cent
• Uncertain/No opinion: 29 respondents or 31.5 per cent

Q47. Do you check weather forecasts/advisories before attending special events? (92 responses)

• Always: 60 respondents or 65.2 per cent
• Most of the time: 27 respondents or 29.3 per cent
• Some of the time: 3 respondents or 3.3 per cent
• Rarely: 1 respondent or 1.1 per cent
• Never: 1 respondent or 1.1 per cent
• I don’t know/No opinion: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• Never: 0 respondents or 0 per cent

Q48. Should the City consider a code of conduct for participants of special events? (92 responses)

• Yes: 44 respondents or 47.8 per cent
• No: 26 respondents or 28.3 per cent
• Uncertain: 22 respondents or 23.9 per cent

Q49. Should the City refuse permits for special events that are against the interests of groups protected by the Ontario Human Rights Code? (92 responses)

• Yes: 53 respondents or 57.6 per cent
• No: 23 respondents or 25 per cent
• Uncertain: 16 respondents or 17.4 per cent

Q50. Should the City refuse permits to special events that do not have accessibility plans in place? (92 responses)

• Yes: 45 respondents or 48.9 per cent
• No: 29 respondents or 31.5 per cent
• Uncertain: 18 respondents or 19.6 per cent

Q51. Should the City provide special event safety training for residents? (92 responses)

• Yes: 37 respondents or 40.2 per cent
• No: 26 respondents or 28.3 per cent
• Uncertain: 29 respondents or 31.5 per cent

Q52. Do you have any suggestions to make it easier to report incidents that occur at special events? (4000 characters max) (31 responses)

Reporting Methods

• Have multiple ways for people to report incidents.
• Make sure these ways of reporting incidents are accessible.

Awareness and Promotion

• Provide clear contact information for reporting in event advertisements, websites, tickets and at the venue itself.
• Post clear signage about reporting procedures at events.

Special Event Staff

• Train staff to identify and report incidents proactively.
• Establish clear policies for reporting incidents and how to manage these complaints.
• Integrate a complaints process into event specific apps.

Responses stated that special event organizers should focus on prevention efforts, ensuring visible event security and police personnel and managing alcohol consumption at events.

Q53. Do you have any additional comments concerning safety or inclusivity to share with the special events review team? (4000 characters max) (92 responses)

Responses provided were along the following themes.

Safety

• Increased security at public transit stations during festivals.
• Better lighting in event areas at night.
• More washrooms and better access to free water.
• Training for special event attendees.
• Better management of intoxicated crowds.

Inclusivity

• Ensuring events are accessible for people with disabilities.
• Address safety concerns for marginalized groups.
• Consider the needs of low-income residents who may not be able to afford expensive events.

Q54. Would you like to help us by answering some questions about yourself? (92 responses)

• Yes: 61 respondents or 66.3 per cent
• No: 31 respondents or 33.7 per cent

Q55. In a typical year, what types of special events do you participate in? (Check all that apply) (61 responses)

• Music festivals: 42 respondents or 68.9 per cent
• Food festivals: 46 respondents or 75.4 per cent
• Ethno-cultural events: 18 respondents or 29.5 per cent
• Fairs: 39 respondents or 63.9 per cent
• Community events: 46 respondents or 75.4 per cent
• Block parties: 11 respondents or 18 per cent
• Events at City beaches: 14 respondents or 23 per cent
• Running/cycling events: 9 respondents or 14.8 per cent
• Food festivals: 46 respondents or 75.4 per cent
• Parades: 32 respondents or 52.5 per cent
• Other: 4 respondents or 6.6 per cent

Q56. How do you identify or express your gender? (Select all that apply) (58 responses)

• Woman: 37 respondents or 63.8 per cent
• Man: 17 respondents or 29.3 per cent
• Transgender: 1 respondent or 1.7 per cent
• Non-binary: 5 respondents or 8.6 per cent

Q57. Are you an Aboriginal/Indigenous person? (Select all that apply) (57 responses)

• I am Inuit: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• I am Métis: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• I am First Nations: 1 respondent or 1.8 per cent
• No: 56 respondents or 98.2 per cent

Q58. Are you a person with one or more disabilities? (59 responses)

• Yes: 28 respondents or 47.5 per cent
• No: 31 respondents or 52.5 per cent

Q59. Are you a member of a visible minority group? (59 responses)

• Yes: 11 respondents or 18.6 per cent
• No: 48 respondents or 81.4 per cent

Q60. Are you a member of the 2SLGBTQQIA+ community? (Two-spirited, Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Trans, Queer, Questioning Intersex, Asexual plus) (59 responses)

• Yes: 23 respondents or 39 per cent
• No: 36 respondents or 61 per cent

Q61. Which of the following describes you: (59 responses)

• Not born in Canada and have lived in Canada for less than 5 years: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• Not born in Canada and have lived in Canada for over 10 years: 11 respondents or 18.6 per cent
• Not born in Canada and have lived in Canada for 5 to 10 years: 2 respondent or 3.4 per cent
• Born in Canada: 46 respondents or 78 per cent

Q63. Please indicate your age from the categories below: (60 responses)

• Under 18: 0 respondents or 0 per cent
• 18-34: 8 respondents or 13.3 per cent
• 35-54: 28 respondents or 46.7 per cent
• 55 to 69: 21 respondents or 35 per cent
• 70 or older: 3 respondents or 5 per cent

The fourth survey concerning the Review of Special Event By-laws is now open.

This survey asks questions about outdoor events on City streets, including parades, demonstrations, block parties, and sidewalk sales.

Have your say before June 27, 2024.

Go to Survey

Residents and tourists welcome Spring with the annual Tulip Festival.
Our first impressions

Our initial assessment of the data collected indicates that residents are generally happy with the state of special event regulations in Ottawa. There may be opportunities for improvement in areas of accessibility and transportation, communications, and environmental protection, and in encouraging greater geographic diversity of events. However, responses show that residents appreciate the diversity of current event offerings and have strong support for the City’s role in facilitating events.

The issues that were of most concern to respondents included:

• Protecting staff and participants from harassment (90 per cent)
• Supporting local artists and musicians (82 per cent)
• Protecting the environment (82 per cent)

The issues where most respondents had no concerns included:

• Providing volunteer and engagement opportunities for youth (30 per cent)
• Minimizing traffic and transit detours or delays (30 per cent)
• Reducing noise (52 per cent)

Concerning demonstrations, the majority of respondents (68 per cent) indicated that they have not been negatively impacted by demonstrations in the previous 12 months. Of the 28 per cent of respondents that reported negative consequences, their primary concerns were:

• Restricting mobility (75 per cent)
• Exposure to offensive views or language (60 per cent)
• Noise (53 per cent)

Postal code data provided by respondents indicates that residents most likely to report negative consequences from demonstrations reside in the urban area (65 per cent) compared to rural (12 per cent) or suburban areas (8 per cent).

Background

The survey was posted on Engage Ottawa from March 4 to March 30, 2024, and was it was promoted through a public service announcement, social media posts, and paid promotion on Facebook running from March 23 to 31, 2024.

In total, 192 residents responded to the survey. The total number of responses for each question is reported beside the question. For convenience, individual responses are reported as both a total and a percentage.

Responses to open-ended questions have been reported in summary format. Individual responses have been cataloged and made anonymous for sharing with the project team and other City departments where appropriate.

Next steps

A detailed analysis of survey results will occur over the coming months. This will include analysis through an equity, diversity, and inclusion lens that will utilize demographic data collected through the survey’s “Tell us about yourself” section. Full analysis will be provided when the project team reports to Committee and Council in early 2025.

Inquiries

If you have questions or comments about the survey results, please contact By-law Reviews at bylawreviews@ottawa.ca or 613-580-2424 ext. 29529.

Survey results

Q1. In a typical year, what types of special events do you participate in? (192 responses)

• Food events: 135 respondents or 70 per cent
• Community events: 126 respondents or 66 per cent
• Music events: 123 respondents or 64 per cent
• Fairs: 100 respondents or 52 per cent
• Ethno-cultural events: 70 respondents or 36 per cent
• Parades: 66 respondents or 34 per cent
• Block Parties: 61 respondents or 32 per cent
• Running or cycling events: 55 respondents or 29 per cent
• Events at City beaches: 55 respondents or 29 per cent
• Other: 16 respondents, or 8 per cent, indicated attendance at farmer’s markets, art and film festivals, fireworks shows, golf tournaments and events at Lansdowne Park

Q2. Please indicate how much you agree with the following statements: (191 responses)

Ottawa has a variety of events for individuals of all interests and backgrounds.

• Definitely Agree: 81 respondents or 42 per cent
• Somewhat Agree: 79 respondents or 41 per cent
• Neither agree nor disagree: 14 respondents or 7 per cent
• Somewhat disagree: 11 respondents or 6 per cent
• Definitely disagree: 6 respondents or 3 per cent

I feel safe when attending special events.

• Definitely Agree: 95 respondents or 50 per cent
• Somewhat Agree: 70 respondents or 37 per cent
• Somewhat disagree: 13 respondents or 7 per cent
• Neither agree nor disagree: 10 respondents or 5 per cent
• Definitely disagree: 3 respondents or 2 per cent

Festivals and other special events are important for quality of life.

• Definitely Agree: 140 respondents or 73 per cent
• Somewhat Agree: 28 respondents or 15 per cent
• Neither agree nor disagree: 14 respondents or 7 per cent
• Somewhat disagree: 5 respondents or 3 per cent
• Definitely disagree: 0 respondents

Investing in festivals and events should be a priority for the City.

• Definitely Agree: 111 respondents or 58 per cent
• Somewhat Agree: 44 respondents or 23 per cent
• Somewhat disagree: 15 respondents or 8 per cent
• Neither agree nor disagree: 12 or 6 per cent
• Definitely disagree: 5 respondents or 3 per cent

Events I attend make recycling and composting easy.

• Somewhat Agree: 64 respondents or 34 per cent
• Neither agree nor disagree: 54 respondents or 28 per cent
• Somewhat disagree: 28 respondents or 15 per cent
• Definitely Agree: 26 respondents or 14 per cent
• Definitely disagree: 19 respondents or 10 per cent

I have opportunities to participate in special events in my neighbourhood.

• Somewhat Agree: 70 respondents or 37 per cent
• Definitely Agree: 49 respondents or 26 per cent
• Neither agree nor disagree: 40 respondents or 21 per cent
• Somewhat disagree: 22 respondents or 12 per cent
• Definitely disagree: 9 respondents or 5 per cent

I am well informed about upcoming special events.

• Somewhat Agree: 82 respondents or 43 per cent
• Somewhat disagree: 39 respondents or 20 per cent
• Neither agree nor disagree: 31 respondents or 16 per cent
• Definitely Agree: 25 respondents or 13 per cent
• Definitely disagree: 14 respondents or 7 per cent

Events organizers try to minimize disruption for the surrounding community.

• Somewhat Agree: 81 respondents or 43 per cent
• Somewhat disagree: 40 respondents or 21 per cent
• Neither agree nor disagree: 30 respondents or 16 per cent
• Definitely Agree: 26 respondents or 14 per cent
• Definitely disagree: 17 respondents or 9 per cent

Q3. Please rank your preferred transportation choices when attending special events, where “1” is the most preferred and “5” is the least preferred. (190 responses)

• Walking or using a mobility device is the most preferred transportation option, with an average score of 2.31.
• Transit had an average score of 2.76.
• Driving had an average score of 2.79.
• Cycling had an average score of 3.34.
• Taxi or private transportation companies had an average score of 3.47.

Q4. How concerned are you about the following issues related to special events: (191 responses)

Reducing noise

• Not concerned: 99 respondents or 52 per cent
• Very concerned: 51 respondents or 27 per cent
• Somewhat concerned: 37 respondents or 19 per cent
• No opinion: 4 respondents or 2 per cent

Providing volunteer and engagement opportunities for youth

• Somewhat concerned: 76 respondents or 40 per cent
• Not concerned: 58 respondents or 30 per cent
• Very concerned: 42 respondents or 22 per cent
• No opinion:4 respondents or 2 per cent

Minimizing traffic and transit detours or delays

• Not concerned: 56 respondents or 29 per cent
• Somewhat concerned: 76 respondents or 40 per cent
• Very concerned: 56 respondents or 29 per cent
• No opinion: 2 respondents or 1 per cent

Supporting local artists and musicians

• Very concerned: 98 respondents or 51 per cent
• Somewhat concerned: 60 respondents or 31 per cent
• Not concerned: 25 respondents or 13 per cent
• No opinion: 7 respondents or 4 per cent

Preventing fighting and other disturbances

• Very concerned: 105 respondents or 55 per cent
• Somewhat concerned: 45 respondents or 24 per cent
• Not concerned: 38 respondents or 20 per cent
• No opinion: 3 respondents or 2 per cent

Encouraging economic development and employment

• Very concerned: 91 respondents or 48 per cent
• Somewhat concerned: 62 respondents or 32 per cent
• Not concerned: 31 respondents or 16 per cent
• No opinion: 7 respondents or 4 per cent

Protecting staff and participants from harassment

• Very concerned: 114 respondents or 60 per cent
• Somewhat concerned: 57 respondents or 30 per cent
• Not concerned: 16 respondents or 08 per cent
• No opinion: 4 respondents or 2 per cent

Improving tourism and nightlife activity

• Very concerned: 81 respondents or 42 per cent
• Somewhat concerned: 48 respondents or 25 per cent
• Not concerned: 30 respondents or 16 per cent
• No opinion: 8 respondents or 4 per cent

Preventing harm due to public intoxication

• Very concerned: 77 respondents or 40 per cent
• Somewhat concerned: 60 respondents or 31 per cent
• Not concerned: 45 respondents or 24 per cent
• No opinion: 5 respondents or 3 per cent

Providing spaces for cultural sharing and celebration

• Not concerned: 39 respondents or 20 per cent
• Somewhat concerned: 54 respondents or 28 per cent
• Very concerned: 90 respondents or 47 per cent
• No opinion: 7 respondents or 4 per cent

Protecting the environment

• Very concerned: 97 respondents or 51 per cent
• Somewhat concerned: 60 respondents or 31 per cent
• Not concerned: 28 respondents or 15 per cent
• No opinion: 5 respondents or 4 per cent

Q5. What do you like the most about special events in the City of Ottawa? (144 responses)

Appreciation for the frequency and variety of special events was a dominant theme in the responses to this question. “They add flavour and excitement to the City”, as one respondent put it. The opportunity to learn and have new experiences and to build a sense of community were also frequent comments. Respondents highlighted the importance of accessible and free events as well as family friendly events and noted the importance of special events for supporting small business and local artists.

Q6. What do you dislike the most about special events in the City of Ottawa? (151 responses)

The concentration of events in the urban area was a frequent comment, with respondents highlighting the challenges created for transportation and parking and the higher frequency of disruptions in urban communities, as well as the lack of programming for suburban and rural communities. Responses indicated that the community is divided in respect to the amount of regulation surrounding special events. Twenty-six responses indicated that events were over regulated, particularly in regards to noise mitigation and other permit requirements, compared to twelve responses that indicated a need for more restrictive regulations in these areas. Promotion of special events and improved information about detours and other impacts were also highlighted as an opportunity for improvement. Finally, eight respondents indicated a need for special events to be more environmentally friendly.

Q7. Have you organized a demonstration or protest march in the previous 12 months? (190 responses)

No 186 responses or 98 percent

Yes 4 responses or 2 percent

Respondents that answered “Yes” to question 7 were also asked:

Q8. Did you apply for an Events on City Streets Permit before your protest? (2 responses)

Yes 2 responses or 100 per cent.

No 0 responses

Q9. Please indicate how much you agree with the following statements: (2 responses)

City staff were responsive to our needs.

1 respondent “Definitely agreed” and 1 respondent “Somewhat agreed”

The permit process helped improve safety for participants.

1 respondent “Definitely agreed” and 1 respondent “Somewhat agreed”

I was treated with respect.

1 respondent “Definitely agreed” and 1 respondent “Somewhat agreed”

The permit process helped to improve communication with emergency services.

1 respondent “Definitely agreed” and 1 respondent “Somewhat agreed”

The permit process helped us manage traffic around our event.

1 respondent “Definitely agreed” and 1 respondent “Somewhat agreed”

The permit process helped to identify City resources and supports available to our event.

1 respondent “Definitely agreed” and 1 respondent “Somewhat agreed”

The permit process helped to reduce unintended impacts on the surrounding public.

Both respondents indicated they “Definitely agreed”

Getting a permit was not a barrier to holding the demonstration.

Both respondents indicated they “Definitely agreed”

Respondents that answered “No” to question 7 were also asked:

Q10. Please detail why you chose not to apply for an Event on City Streets Permit before your demonstration:

No respondents answered “no” to question 7.

Q 11. Have you participated in a demonstration or protest march in the previous 12 months? (191 responses)

No 149 respondents or 78 per cent

Yes 37 respondents or 19 per cent

I don’t recall / Prefer not to say 5 respondents or 3 per cent

Respondents that answered “Yes” to question 11 were also asked:

Q12. Please indicate how much you agree with the following statements: (35 responses)

I felt safe participating in the demonstration.

• Somewhat agree: 15 respondents or 43 per cent
• Definitely agree: 11 respondents or 31 per cent
• Somewhat disagree: 5 respondents or 14 per cent
• Neither agree nor disagree: 3 respondents or 9 per cent
• Definitely disagree: 1 respondent or 3 per cent

City staff were professional when interacting with our group.

• Neither agree nor disagree: 9 respondents or 26 per cent
• Definitely agree: 7 respondents or 20 per cent
• Somewhat disagree: 7 respondents or 20 per cent
• Somewhat agree: 6 respondents or 17 per cent
• Definitely disagree: 6 respondents or 17 per cent

I had the opportunity to express my views.

• Definitely agree: 15 respondents or 43 per cent
• Somewhat agree: 9 respondents or 26 per cent
• Somewhat disagree: 5 respondents or 14 per cent
• Neither agree nor disagree: 3 respondents or 9 per cent
• Definitely disagree: 1 respondents or 3 per cent

Q13. Have you been negatively impacted by a demonstration or protest march in the previous 12 months? (191 responses)

No 130 respondents or 68 per cent

Yes 54 respondents or 28 per cent

I don’t recall 7 respondents or 4 per cent

Respondents that answered “Yes” to question 13 were also asked:

Q14. In what ways have demonstrations or protest marches negatively impacted you? (54 responses)

Noise 31

Restricting mobility 40

Harassment or discrimination 20

Violence or threats of violence 15

Offensive views 32

Loss of income 3

Physical well-being 13

Mental well-being 28

Other: 2 responses indicated that protest activity prevents them from going to the Parliamentary precent or other amenities, 1 indicated anti-social behaviour as a bad influence and 1 indicated negative impacts on other planned events

Q15. Do you have any additional comments to share with the special events review team? (79 responses)

Respondents provided 36 comments related to special events, 24 comments related to demonstrations and 18 comments that were not related to the issues under review.

Of the comments related to special events, the prevailing sentiment was that respondents wanted to see more special events, with greater variety and in all parts of the City. There were eight responses expressing desire for less regulation and three responses seeking greater regulation or enforcement of community nuisance issues.

Of the comments related to demonstrations, eight comments expressed negative views concerning the impact of demonstration activities in the downtown core and four comments supported demonstrations. There were seven comments critical of enforcement practices related to demonstrations, with concern for the fair and consistent application of regulations as the dominant theme.